Showing posts with label IPad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPad. Show all posts

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Gadgets: Roku players offer streaming content, varied price-points

High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI)Image via WikipediaStreaming video can't be much easier than with the new low-cost Roku 2 XS.

The hockey puck-sized device connects to a Wi-Fi network (or wired with an Ethernet cable) and gives you instant access to stream video content without of a PC.

Netflix, Amazon instant video, Disney, network TV, MLB.TV and my favorite, Hulu Plus, are just some of what seems like an endless amount of content available for subscriptions and viewing.

Video can be played in standard definition (composite AV cable included) or in high-definition with the HDMI port (HDMI cable not included).

Content can also be stored and played on microSD cards or USB via the ports on the back of the hardware.

Gamers will like the included Bluetooth remote control for gaming, but it also controls the video content menus. A free copy of "Angry Birds" is included.

If you don't feel a need for the Bluetooth remote, the Roku 2 XD will cost you a little less and have a standard IR remote.

The Roku 2 HD takes the price even lower if you only want to broadcast in 720p instead of the 1080p the other models broadcast.

A wall outlet power supply is included but there is no power button, so it's on when in use and goes to sleep when not.

Details: www.Roku.com $89 for the Roku 2 XS, about $70 for the Roku 2 XD and $62 for the Roku 2 HD

JABRA FREEWAY GREAT FOR CALLS IN OR OUT OF THE CAR

The Jabra Freeway can be considered a do-it-all type of Bluetooth speaker but is especially a great choice for hands-free cellular calls in or out of a car.

A visor mount is built-into the speaker for easy installation right over your head.

Calls are heard crystal clear in the device, which has a three-speaker stereo system behind the fabric cloth covering in a case that measures about 4.75 by 3.5 by 0.5 inches.

Obviously music is broadcast much better from your existing car stereo system but if you take the Freeway with you on a trip, it makes for a nice companion for any portable media player.

A dual microphone with noise reduction technology lets others hear you crystal clear and a built-in rechargeable battery lasts for about 40 hours in standby mode or for about 14 hours of talking.

It's equipped with a motion detector to put the device to sleep after it hasn't moved for an extended amount of time.

All the buttons face you when the speaker is mounted on a sun visor and are positioned for easy access to adjust volume, muting calls and setting voice commands.
Once the voice commands are set up everything will truly be hands-free.

Everything worked as well as advertised and callers heard me clear as well.

Using the speaker with my iPad in a hotel room was a pleasant surprise. While it wasn't party atmosphere quality audio, it certainly was more than acceptable given what I was using it for.

Along with the speaker, a free 1-year subscription to Voice Assist is included. This allows hands-free voice commands for texting, emailing and even posting to Facebook while driving.

Details: www.jabra.com $100

IFROGZ VERTEX HEADPHONES OFFER UNIQUE FEATURE

The iFrogz Vertex headphones are one of the first sets of padded headphones I've seen with a microphone on the wire.

To answer calls all you have to do is press the answer call button, which is on the headphones cable.

As long as your cell phone allows it, the music will stop while the call is answered. Music can also be paused and restarted with this button.

An adjustable headband made with a combination of plastic and metal, connects the soft and comfortable padded speakers (40mm drivers).

For storage, the headband also folds up enabling the headphones to take up less space in your computer bag.

As for sound, they sound decent but when you see the price tag they seem like an even better deal.

Details: www.iFrogz.com $29



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/10/19/3989689/gadgets-roku-players-offer-streaming.html#ixzz1bJJoSH6i
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Life after Netflix

As you may have heard, on Tuesday Netflix raised its rates for combined DVD and streaming subscriptions. Previously, customers on the one-DVD-at-a-time plan could also stream movies from the service’s Watch Instantly service, for $10 a month. Starting in September for existing customers (and immediately for new subscribers), the price for that plan jumps to $16 per month (other DVDs plans go up as well). Although there may be legitimate reasons why Netflix needs to charge more, many customers find themselves less than thrilled by that 60 percent price hike. I count myself among them.
I decided to take a closer look at Netflix’s new plans, and compare them to the offerings from various Netflix competitors. Is the newly pricier Netflix still the best option for my entertainment needs? Or should I jump ship?

My setup

Before you can adequately determine which movie and television subscription service to choose, you need to figure out what you want, as well as what services your entertainment setup supports. At my home, we’ve long relied on Netflix as an alternative to paying for premium movie channels. We’re aggressive about watching (and returning) our DVDs, and we use the Watch Instantly streaming service plenty too. We rent both movies and TV shows, and we use Watch Instantly when we have neither TiVo’d shows queued up nor a Netflix DVD at home. And we stream shows like Dora the Explorer and The Backyardigans for our kids.
One goal I haven’t quite yet met is cutting my cable entirely. We keep cable for kids shows that aren’t on Netflix (I’m looking at you, Team Umizoomi), for Philadelphia Eagles games that I can’t get over the air with an antenna, and for the ability to watch first-run shows (via TiVo) as they air.
Our entertainment center includes a TiVo HD and a Mac mini. The TiVo supports Netflix’s service—along with Amazon, Blockbuster, and other services—and the Mac mini of course can handle any online service that works in a Web browser. If you instead rely on an Apple TVRoku Player, or TiVo Premiere, your supported services will differ.

Netflix

The path of least resistance for me, I suppose, is sticking with the Netflix service I already have. But paying $6 more per month to continue the same service I’ve been using means paying another $72 per year. The new $16-per-month rate is actually more than my local cable company (Cablevision) charges for subscriptions to HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, Starz/Encore, or TMC; the old rate was $3 to $5 cheaper than those premium channel subscriptions.
Netflix couples two advantages over HBO and its brethren: the included on-demand viewing with Watch Instantly, and the ability to dictate which movies are “aired” by virtue of choosing my DVDs.
According to Netflix, it has “thousands of movies and TV episodes available to watch instantly”; the Instant Watcher website pegs the exact number at 12,382 streaming movies as of this writing. The company no longer advertises how many DVDs it has—and, in fact, seems to treat its DVD mailing service as an afterthought—but back in 2009, Netflix said it had 100,000 titles on DVD.
The point: You can almost definitely find the movie or TV show you want in Netflix’s DVD library. Your odds are worse (though generally improving) with the Watch Instantly service. Besides its smaller size, Netflix’s streaming catalog is a challenge because it is seemingly in endless flux. While new DVDs arrive while they’re released—or, more often now, 30 days after their initial release—streaming titles arrive when deals are struck, and they expire when those deals expire. In other words, Netflix owns its DVDs and can rent them as long as it wants; streaming titles, however, are on borrowed time (something my colleague Dan Moren has noticed as well).
There’s a lot to love about Netflix, though. Watch Instantly works with oodles of devices, including the iPad, iPhone, Apple TV, TiVo, Playstation, Xbox, Wii, Roku, and oodles of other Internet-ready televisions, DVD players, and set-top boxes. The website is fairly usable, and the movie recommendations engine that Netflix employs is impressive.
So if I choose to abandon Netflix, it won’t be because of any perceived weakness in the product offering. But that’s the combined streaming and DVD offering. I regularly use both. Forced to choose between an $8 monthly DVD plan or an $8 monthly streaming plan, I simply don’t know which to pick. I love the wider selection of Netflix’s DVD library, but I love the always-available, always-on aspect of the streaming service. Is the combination worth $16? I suppose so—unless I can find a viable alternative.

Blockbuster

Spoiler alert: Blockbuster’s DVD-by-mail service and On Demand streaming catalog is not a viable alternative. Here’s a list of the benefits Blockbuster’s offering sports over Netflix’s:
  • New releases are often available one month before Netflix or Redbox get them.
That’s it. In almost every other way, Blockbuster’s service is laughably inferior. Start with the cost: Blockbuster charges $12 a month for its one-disc-at-a-time plan. (To be fair to Blockbuster, the company includes video game discs in that plan, so you can rent those too.)
Blockbuster does offer five “in-store exchanges” with its subscriptions. That means you can take your movie back to a Blockbuster store near you (if you can find any that are still in business) and exchange it for another rental. The Blockbusters near me are all shuttered, and one appealing element of DVD-by-mail services is the fact that I don’t need to drive to a store.
At $12 a month to Netflix’s $8 matching DVD plan, Blockbuster’s pricing seems out of whack. You might assume that maybe Blockbuster’s plan at least includes streaming? But you’d be wrong.
Blockbuster doesn’t offer a streaming plan. Its On Demand movies are charged per use, with variable pricing ranging from $1 to $5 per rental. (You can also purchase On Demand movies from Blockbuster, which are then kept in a digital locker from which you can re-stream the movie at any time.) To Blockbuster’s credit, because it charges so much for On Demand rentals, it’s able to stream more current titles than Netflix. At this writing, I could stream The Lincoln Lawyer from Blockbuster for $4, but need to wait for the DVD from Netflix. But I like the notion of paying Netflix a flat $8 rate for streaming from its catalog, versus paying Blockbuster piecemeal.
Besides its lousy pricing and old-school streaming approach, Blockbuster’s a tough sell for Apple device owners. While various Blu-ray players, TiVos, and set-top boxes integrate with Blockbuster’s On Demand service, no Apple products do—the iPad, iPhone, and Apple TV don’t work with Blockbuster at all.
Overall, it feels like Blockbuster’s barely in this fight. The pricing’s nutty, the lack of support on Apple devices disappointing, and the absence of a streaming plan a deal-breaker.

Amazon Prime Instant Video

Amazon doesn’t offer DVDs by mail—unless you purchase them the old-fashioned, e-commerce way. But it does offer a subscription movie and TV show streaming service, and it’s made Instant Video part of Amazon Prime.
Amazon Prime, for the uninitiated, is a $79-per-year subscription that grants the buyer free two-day shipping with no minimum order size, or one-day shipping for $4 an item, for many products. While Amazon sometimes makes Prime available for free to certain customers (as it does with its Amazon Mom program), you must pony up the full $79 Prime fee to gain access to the Instant Video offering. That fee works out to $6.58 per month.
According to Amazon, its streaming library includes more than 6000 movies and TV shows. When I clicked to see all of Amazon’s “Prime Eligible” titles, however, I saw a list of merely 2548 videos—including 513 TV shows.
It’s a bit tough to browse Amazon’s Prime Eligible catalog; you can’t limit your searches to Prime Eligible videos only, and there are many more thousands of movies that you can stream instantly by renting or buying them (for considerably more than “free”).
While Amazon’s digital movies available for purchase and rent can play on TiVos, the Prime Instant videos aren’t compatible. Prime videos also don’t play back on iPads, iPhones, or the Apple TV. They play back fine on your Mac via Flash, and the service is compatible with numerous other devices, including the Roku.
To me, Prime will be tempting only if Amazon’s able to expand its video selection dramatically. It’s great that Amazon has every season of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood, oodles of reality cooking shows, and the Tom Hanks/Meg Ryan classic You’ve Got Mail. Unfortunately, the service is severely lacking in current titles.

Hulu Plus

Ah, Hulu. Sometimes it feels like proof that the production studios really “get it,” and sometimes it doesn’t. Hulu Plus offers a variety of advantages over the basic free Hulu offering: It includes more than 1000 seasons of current and classic TV shows—more than 33,000 episodes—with 70 shows that are limited to Plus subscribers only. In addition to the “hundreds of movies and documentaries” that Hulu offers everyone, Plus adds “hundreds of exclusive films from The Criterion Collection.” When possible, Hulu Plus content streams in 720p High Definition.
And, unlike regular old Hulu, Hulu Plus can stream to devices besides computers—including the iPad and the iPhone (but notably not the Apple TV).
Hulu Plus costs $8 per month—just like Netflix’s streaming-only package. In an advantage over Netflix, Hulu Plus often includes every (aired) episode of the current season of the television shows in its library, and often includes every episode for every season, though that’s determined on a show by show basis.
Some Hulu Plus content—usually television shows and not movies—includes limited commercial interruptions; Hulu says this is “to keep the price low, given the high licensing costs of current season TV episodes.”
I find Hulu’s site a bit annoying to navigate. It feels hard to get a sense of every show available, since you can’t easily find a master list. Hulu wants you to browse alphabetically or by popularity, and doesn’t offer any obvious way to browse by release date (or even “added to Hulu” date). That’s probably because Hulu adds (and includes) very, very little in the way of new movies; they’re mostly older titles. The current TV shows are great for cord-cutters; the small, largely outdated movie library is disappointing for film fanatics.

Zediva

Man, does the MPAA hate Zediva. When you watch movies from Netflix and its competitors (whether streaming or DVD-by-mail), you often miss out. Many times, studios sell DVD-by-mail services limited discs that lack extras like commentary tracks or behind-the-scenes features, and streaming services almost neverinclude that content.
Zediva’s different. The streaming-only service goes out and buys physical copies of the in-store versions of new DVDs, and when you click to play a movie, that actual DVD is inserted into an actual DVD player. You then take control of that DVD player to play back the movie you want to watch.
It makes for an interesting combination of good and not-so-good. Zediva gets new movies the instant they come out, because it’s not restricted by any studio agreements. The company offers a library of fewer than 200 movies; Zediva’s focus is on stocking the most popular movies of the past year, not every movie ever made.
But because you’re controlling an actual DVD as it plays back, you lose the benefit of even the limited buffering that other services offer. Pause a Zediva movie, and prepare to wait as many as 30 seconds for it to load up again when you attempt to resume. We often have three kids under the age of five sleeping upstairs when we match movies, and rare is the night we don’t have to pause once or twice—not to mention our own bathroom or snack breaks. The sluggish unpausing with Zediva got old fast in my testing.
At the moment, Zediva’s offering what it calls “introductory pricing.” You pay $2 per movie, or $10 for 10 movies. Here’s a case where I don’t mind the pay-as-you-go model, since a buck a movie strikes me as pretty reasonable.
That $1-per-movie pricing sounds familiar…

Redbox

Like Zediva, Redbox charges just a buck a day per rental. And like Zediva, Redbox doesn’t aim to offer every single DVD ever made—though Redbox’s available catalog dwarfs Zediva’s.
The downside to Redbox is that you must leave your house in order to use it. Again, at $1 per movie, I think the price is right. But the problem is that if you don’t get back to the Redbox kiosk within 24 hours of renting, you’re charged another dollar for your movie.
That’s a fair business model—but not one that works for me.

iTunes

I know, I know: Some of you swear by iTunes rentals and purchases. I don’t like it. I don’t like the long wait for high definition movies to download; I don’t like the draconian requirements on how long you get to watch your rented movie before it expires, and I don’t like the relatively high rental prices—$5 for new HD releases. I would welcome a competitively-priced Apple-run movie subscription service, but I’m not holding my breath.

What’s next?

There’s one fact that I believe is indisputable: Pricing issues aside, none of the currently available services can outshine Netflix’s offering. And since no streaming service can rival Netflix’s catalog, you can’t really replace Netflix entirely by combining two services.
My least likely option, however, is sticking with what I have now. I believe that paying $16 a month for a service that was once $10 (and, just a few months before that, $9) irks me. I think the blame for that cost increase falls mostly on the shoulders of the studios that license content to Netflix, although the company hasn’t said so publicly. If enough likeminded customers scale back or cancel their Netflix subscriptions, I don’t know that it punishes the studios—but perhaps it will help send a message. (Particularly if we don’t all start—heaven forbid—buying DVDs again.)
Today, there are many movies on my DVD queue with Netflix that aren’t available to watch instantly. There are barely any films on my Watch Instantly queue that aren’t available on DVD. Thus, one option I’m considering—with a heavy heart—is dropping the streaming and sticking with an $8, DVD-only plan.
I’m also debating dropping Netflix completely, and then signing up for Hulu Plus and Zediva, or (less likely) Amazon Prime and Zediva. Zediva will let me watch new releases I’m interested in, and Hulu Plus just may enable me to cut the cable cord—though I still don’t know what to do about those Eagles games.
Of course, if I cut out cable completely, then maybe it’s worth it to stick with Netflix after all—in addition to Hulu Plus for current shows, since I’d be saving so much on the cable bill. But, at least where I live, the cable company raises your phone and Internet prices if you drop the TV package, so the savings are less substantial than I’d like.
What’s clear to me—and trust me, I get that this is a personal decision for each customer to make—is that Netflix is a no-brainer at $10 a month for DVDs and streaming. At $16 per month, though, it requires a lot more rumination.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Peel is an iPhone-based remote, except when it isn’t

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

You have an Apple iPhone, and you have a flat-panel TV, a home sound system perhaps and certainly a cable/satellite box with a digital video recorder, or DVR. Maybe you also own a Roku player or an Apple TV to stream additional video content to the aforementioned TV.

Want to guess how many remote controls you have? Three or four, perhaps, and maybe more if you have extra gear hooked up to everything. Wouldn’t you rather have just one remote, especially if it could be, say, that iPhone, or maybe an Android phone?

This is — and simultaneously isn’t — the concept behind Peel, a $99 device that sits between your wireless router, your television and the rest of your home entertainment setup. Plug a cable-cum-transmitter into your home network’s wireless router, place the pear-shaped “fruit” by your TV, enter a simple access code into the free Peel app available now for iPhone/iPad/iPod Touch and soon for Android, and you’re good to go. Peel will, its makers claim, control your TV, cable box, digital video recorder, and home stereo system, at a price that’s less than many competitors ask.

According to Peel CEO Thiru Arunachalam, the device, once installed, will let users do “everything a consumer will do on a daily basis” with that warren of individual remote controls.

Well, yes, Mr. Aryunachalam, and no. Instead of what is a “standard” for universal remote control devices, the ability to punch in channel numbers and go to Food Network or MTV or ESPN, you’re offered a range of pictures: an icon for “Law and Order” will find all the episodes currently airing, ditto for a sports program or what have you. Peel’s CEO claims “the concept of channel numbers will go away,” as consumers move to time-shifted recordings of baseball games, streaming rentals from Netflix and downloads via Roku, and so forth.

That may well be the case, and the band Choking Victim’s “500 channels of a day-dream stimulation” will be numberless at some point in the future. For now, most of us watch Fox 45 or USA9 and so on. Hardcore HGTV fans on Verizon FiOS in Howard County know it’s channel 665, and that HBO begins at 901.

Thus, the inability to tap in a number is a bit of a problem, but Mr. Aryunachalam asserts that two soon-coming tweaks: the ability to establish an unlimited number of “favorite” channels — one or two taps on the iPhone screen and you’re there; and a way to search via channel number. Again, tap twice and you switch over.

The channel-number-is-dying postulate comes, Mr. Aryunachalam said in a telephone interview, from what smartphones have done to dialing. Instead of memorizing your brother-in-law’s number, you call up his name in your contact list, tap on the appropriate number, and it’s “dialed.”

I feel as if I might need an Excedrin or two, and soon.

In very limited testing — I installed Peel after my less-than-three-years-old Logitech Harmony One remote’s LCD screen suddenly died — Peel seems to work well, but not as well as one might hope. The search-by-icon paradigm is off-putting to some users, and the lack of a way to directly input a channel number is frustrating. Ditto for no easy means of punching up an on-screen guide to make station selection a tad easier.

Mr. Aryunachalam is smart enough to recognize that customer demand will drive his firm’s actions. If enough Peel users demand a remote that’s more traditional, he’ll rework the software in that direction. And there are other firms who are angling to supply the same market; I know of two, one of whom, Gear4, said they would send a device for testing. TiVo users can also download an application called Peanut, which, if the DVR is connected to your home wireless network, will mimic a classic TiVo remote control.

We’re on the cusp of bringing everything together on an iPhone, iPad or Android tablet. Until that digital nirvana arrives, Peel makes for an interesting, if sometimes frustrating, step in the right direction. Details on the product are at www.peel.com.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Spacevidcast to Provide Unprecedented Coverage of Final Space Shuttle Launch

Spacevidcast, the online media outlet that covers all elements of space flight has a motto, “Making space – common place.” What the Minnesota-based firm is planning in terms of covering the final launch of a space shuttle – is anything but commonplace. The show is scheduled to be on-air for 14 hours, from July 7 at 10 p.m. EDT until July 8 at noon EDT. The show will also be interactive, with viewers able to ask guests questions. Anyone can ask the pilot of the first space shuttle mission, current astronauts or the people that make the machines go – the questions they have always wondered.

“This will be one of, if not the most watched space shuttle launch ever,” said Spacevidcast’s Producer Benjamin Higginbotham. “Spacevidcast doesn't want to just broadcast this event; we want people to be able to experience it. You can call in and ask your questions of astronauts, engineers, press and more in your own video via Skype, Twitter, Facebook and more.”

Although Spacevidcast normally broadcasts on Ustream in true HD, the site’s owners recognize that not everyone’s computer can handle this and provide both SD and mobile formats as well. The show can also be viewed live on the iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, Android Phone or the Roku Box that connects to your HDTV.

Spacevidcast has surged in popularity. For the final launch of the space shuttle Discovery nearly 1 million unique viewers watched the webcast. Wired.com recently named the outlet one of the best ways to watch a shuttle launch online. Spacevidcast is expecting to easily cap the 1 million mark for this historic flight. Part of the show’s launch day success is its format. Spacevidcast is the only online shuttle webcast that provides viewers with real-time ascent data. These include the shuttle’s speed, altitude, the G-Forces that the vehicle is pulling and much more.

Spacevidcast has been broadcasting live launches for over 4 years. It is currently working to produce smaller live shows highlighting launches of rockets that, for the time being, are unmanned. These include the Delta IV series, Atlas and Falcon 9 rockets. Spacevidcast is dedicated to the promotion of space flight. To accomplish this it not only has its live launch coverage, but a weekly series, on-demand specials and mini segments called “Space Pods.” Spacevidcast’s current focus is the final launch of the shuttle program.

“Shuttle launches can be a bit like the superbowl. Get a bunch of friends together around your HDTV, grab some food and drinks and watch the action unfold. Shuttle launches can be nail biters to the bitter end with things like weather, technical issues and even boats starting and stopping the countdown,” Higginbotham said. “STS-133 which was the final flight of Discovery launched with only 2 seconds left in the available window, and it was a lot of fun. To create the ultimate Superbowl experience Spacevidcast has our own Roku channel. By adding our free channel to your Roku HD player available at www.roku.com and Amazon.com you can watch live in true HD right on your home HDTV.”
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Apple TV vs. Roku

Anybody who's paid attention to me here or on Twitter knows that I love Roku.

But this past weekend, I had to make some room on my television stand for its bigger-named competitor: Apple TV.

For fathers day this past weekend, my wife gifted me the Apple TV. We already had a Roku player for a couple years, but I have wanted to experience the Apple TV and how it integrates with other Apple devices, such as the iPhone and the iPad.

For people who want to stream such multimedia content as Netflix, Youtube, Amazon Video on Demand, and iTunes, these two devices can individually satisfy some of your needs.

In a video below, I cover some of the main features, similarities and differences between Apple TV ($99) and Roku (starting at $59). There are big pluses for both devices: Apple TV works very well with iDevices, plus offers iTunes, Youtube, Netflix and compatibility with many apps in Apple's App Store. [I've yet to play with the Boxee, another device that brings Internet content to your TV; it costs $199, which puts it in a different price point than Apple TV and Roku. And what about Google TV? -- I've heard so many poor reviews of it that I haven't even had an itch to try it out.]

Roku is an exciting upstart company with a device that's attracting scores of media companies to develop independent multimedia content for its platform. That means more choices for the consumer. If you value independent fare, take a close look at the Roku.

Take a gander at the vid below, then let me know if you have any follow-up questions or points to make.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Linksys E4200: New technology in an old house

House of horrors

Even for a high-end device such as the E4200, my home is horror show. The router needs to support three roaming laptops, a roving iPad used for video streaming, a Roku Streaming Player in the kitchen and a wireless N-enabled Blu-Ray player in the family room that streams Netflix movies and other video at 720p resolution. The E4200 has to support all this while stationed in the poorest possible location in the house: my office.

My office is located on the first floor in the very rear of a rambling two-story 1851 New England farm house. Not only is the office not centrally located, but it is surrounded on three sides by the kitchen, laundry room and master bathroom, each of which is filled with plumbing and big metal appliances that can wreak havoc with wireless signals. "That's the worst place to set up a router," warned a Cisco spokesperson, when told of my plans for locating the device. In the real world, however, you can't always choose where to place your router.

The problem with my office, according to Cisco, is that radio waves reflect off metal surfaces, bounce around more before reaching their destination and slow down performance. So what is the biggest problem item in the home when it comes to complaints about wireless performance? According to Cisco, it's a full-length mirror mounted on a nearby wall or door.

Then there's the issue of electrical interference. In my house, the six wireless phones and the microwave can become sources of interference when in use, particularly when positioned too close to the E4200 or other wireless devices.

I've been through three wireless routers, have had my share of problems and would encourage anyone considering cutting the cable service and relying on wireless streaming to test extensively before thumbing your nose at Time Warner, Cox or Comcast. If you can do it inexpensively, hardwiring is always the better alternative. I can't.

Getting started

I tested the E4200 from my office, connecting it to a Westell 7500 DSL modem provided by my ISP. My service has a maximum rated bandwidth of 1Mbps up and 15 Mbps down.

Once you've connected the router, the Cisco Connect installation software takes several minutes to complete the setup, automatically configuring security and assigning a strong password by default. I was up and running in about five minutes. The E4200 has a administration screen, with lots of arcane settings for the more technical user, but most people will never need to see it.

Like other routers in this class, the E4200 offers a guest account that lets you provide Web access for up to ten visitors while protecting devices on your internal network from prying eyes. It also supports a USB-attached hard drive for file sharing or streaming of video stored on a UPnP media server.

How I tested

To test performance, I roamed the house with a MacBook and an iPad and tested video streaming to wireless devices in the adjacent kitchen and upstairs family room as well as on the iPad. I ran tests from four locations, including streaming devices hooked to televisions in the first-floor kitchen and the second-floor family room, both about 25 feet away from the router; and in the first-floor living room and second-floor master bedroom, both about 50 feet away and at the opposite end of the house.

On the iPad, I used Netflix's iPad app to load and stream movies and then ran the performance tests available at speedtest.net. On the MacBook, I ran both Cisco's included performance testing utility, which checks performance between the MacBook and the router, and the Speedtest suite, which extended the performance test out to the Internet, to a Web server 50 miles away. I ran each test at least three times in each location and used the average of all tests.

I then enabled the wireless G functionality on my ISP-provided Westell 7500 DSL modem, ran the same tests and compared the results.
Enhanced by Zemanta